Why do we have to keep having the “Video Games are Art” discussion? Because after two hundred years, photography is still having this conversation and if we want to keep moving this medium along we have to constantly be analyzing the reasons why we consider it an art form. And while video games at this point in time are judged based on their relationships to other mediums, it is through this internal study that we will develop how it moves into its own.
Let us keep with the photography example to continue this conversation. There’s a period in Photography becoming an art form where artists felt that in order to become worthy of the “Fine Art” moniker that they had to imitate painting. This was called Pictorialism. During this period, lasting roughly thirty years, photographers would apply any technique they could think of to hide the fact that they were photographs. Soft focus, gum bichromate, negative scratching, nothing was above omission because these photographers thought that if they were ever going to be respected, they needed to conform to the old guard’s idea of what Art was. (See Steichen’s “Moonrise”)
Of course what naturally occurred was the development of Straight Photography by the f/64s, the antithesis to Pictorialism, in which the inherent qualities of a photograph are considered the art form. They essentially thumbed their noses at painting, and explored what photography as a medium was capable of doing better than any other medium, which for them was to say that it could capture a scene in a way that painting was unable to at the time.
Painting, the much older medium, is now in turn greatly influenced by photography, from the cropped off edges of Manet’s “A Bar at the Folies-Bergere” to the Photorealism of Estes’ “Telephone Booths”. If it weren’t for photography constantly re-examining itself and where they fit in the world of art, it wouldn’t be as respected as it is today. And photographers still have to fight tooth and nail to be considered an art form. I still hear the argument that, “Anyone can take a photograph, therefore it’s not really art.”
What does this means for Video Games? The moment that we stop arguing for the medium as an art form, the moment we stop looking at ourselves is the moment we stop evolving into the Art we were meant to be. At this point we’re Pictorialists, grasping onto film for dear life. We haven’t decided what it means to be a video game or what video game art will produce in the future. So I, for one (of many), will continue to talk about it until I’m blue in the face. Or until I’m dead, which is probably more likely giving the length of time it takes to get any respect in the art world.








